Party With Victorious Full Episode Extended Version \/\/TOP\\\\

First, it does not represent natural outlook of Russian people. Latter are, by and large, friendly to outside world, eager for experience of it, eager to measure against it talents they are conscious of possessing, eager above all to live in peace and enjoy fruits of their own labor. Party line only represents thesis which official propaganda machine puts forward with great skill and persistence to a public often remarkably resistant in the stronghold of its innermost thoughts. But party line is binding for outlook and conduct of people who make up apparatus of power--party, secret police and Government--and it is exclusively with these that we have to deal.

Second, please note that premises on which this party line is based are for most part simply not true. Experience has shown that peaceful and mutually profitable coexistence of capitalist and socialist states is entirely possible. Basic internal conflicts in advanced countries are no longer primarily those arising out of capitalist ownership of means of production, but are ones arising from advanced urbanism and industrialism as such, which Russia has thus far been spared not by socialism but only by her own backwardness. Internal rivalries of capitalism do not always generate wars; and not all wars are attributable to this cause. To speak of possibility of intervention against USSR today, after elimination of Germany and Japan and after example of recent war, is sheerest nonsense. If not provoked by forces of intolerance and subversion "capitalist" world of today is quite capable of living at peace with itself and with Russia. Finally, no sane person has reason to doubt sincerity of moderate socialist leaders in Western countries. Nor is it fair to deny success of their efforts to improve conditions for working population whenever, as in Scandinavia, they have been given chance to show what they could do.

Nevertheless, all these theses, however baseless and disproven, are being boldly put forward again today. What does this indicate? It indicates that Soviet party line is not based on any objective analysis of situation beyond Russia's borders; that it has, indeed, little to do with conditions outside of Russia; that it arises mainly from basic inner-Russian necessities which existed before recent war and exist today.

It should not be thought from above that Soviet party line is necessarily disingenuous and insincere on part of all those who put it forward. Many of them are too ignorant of outside world and mentally too dependent to question [apparent omission] self-hypnotism, and who have no difficulty making themselves believe what they find it comforting and convenient to believe. Finally we have the unsolved mystery as to who, if anyone, in this great land actually receives accurate and unbiased information about outside world. In atmosphere of oriental secretiveness and conspiracy which pervades this Government, possibilities for distorting or poisoning sources and currents of information are infinite. The very disrespect of Russians for objective truth--indeed, their disbelief in its existence--leads them to view all stated facts as instruments for furtherance of one ulterior purpose or another. There is good reason to suspect that this Government is actually a conspiracy within a conspiracy; and I for one am reluctant to believe that Stalin himself receives anything like an objective picture of outside world. Here there is ample scope for the type of subtle intrigue at which Russians are past masters. Inability of foreign governments to place their case squarely before Russian policy makers--extent to which they are delivered up in their relations with Russia to good graces of obscure and unknown advisors whom they never see and cannot influence--this to my mind is most disquieting feature of diplomacy in Moscow, and one which Western statesmen would do well to keep in mind if they would understand nature of difficulties encountered here.

2. Rank and file of Communist Parties. Note distinction is drawn between those and persons defined in paragraph 1. This distinction has become much sharper in recent years. Whereas formerly foreign Communist Parties represented a curious (and from Moscow's standpoint often inconvenient) mixture of conspiracy and legitimate activity, now the conspiratorial element has been neatly concentrated in inner circle and ordered underground, while rank and file--no longer even taken into confidence about realities of movement--are thrust forward as bona fide internal partisans of certain political tendencies within their respective countries, genuinely innocent of conspiratorial connection with foreign states. Only in certain countries where communists are numerically strong do they now regularly appear and act as a body. As a rule they are used to penetrate, and to influence or dominate, as case may be, other organizations less likely to be suspected of being tools of Soviet Government, with a view to accomplishing their purposes through [apparent omission] organizations, rather than by direct action as a separate political party.

The country has been in political limbo since June's election there failed to produce a clear-cut winner. That all changed last night, when President Recep Erdogan's party emerged victorious in Sunday's snap election. Supporters say the win is a return to stability.

McConnell has already talked about the possibility and outlined the party's plan should they gain a Senate majority. According to McConnell, his first goal as majority leader "would be to see if there are things we can agree on with the president," such as "comprehensive tax reform" and "trade agreements," NPR reported.

Kharge, who has been elected from the Gurmittkal constituency in North Karnataka eight times in a row, will be contesting from Chitapur after he lost his pet constituency to delimitation. Kharge who joined the Congress 40 years back was elected as a legislator for the first time in 1972. He held several portfolios in various Congress-led governments in Karnataka and was the home minister when the state faced one of its worst-ever crisis -- the abduction of matinee idol Dr Rajkumar at the hands of notorious forest brigand Veerappan.Congress insiders say it is now or never for Kharge to become the state chief minister. Kharge has lost the race to the top post twice in the past to S M Krishna and N Dharam Singh. He, however, is not thinking about it now. At present, it is his duty to ensure that his party wins the polls with a comfortable majority.Kharge spoke to Vicky Nanjappa about the prospects of the Congress in Karnataka, his aspirations on becoming chief minister and other issues pertaining to 2008 state election. How do you think the Congress will fare in the elections this year? The people of Karnataka have seen a stable and efficient rule by a Congress-led government from 1999 to 2004 and also the 20-month rule of the N Dharam Singh-led coalition government. They have also seen the 20-month misrule by the BJP-JD-S combine, who came to power only to enjoy it and reap its benefits for their selfish needs. It was a rule of chaos, anarchy, inaction, and full of corruption. People of the state are fed up with coalition governments and they want a strong and stable government, which can last a full term and can provide development oriented programmes. They have realised that only the Congress party can provide such governance and hence, the Congress has a very fair chance of winning a majority of the seats. How many seats does the Congress expect to win? How many seats? I do not want to predict that. But definitely the Congress will get sufficient seats to form the government on its own. If you fall short of majority, then which party will you form the government with? This is a hypothetical question, which cannot be answered at this stage. As we are confident of forming our own government, the need to take the support of another party does not arise. Will you be the chief minister if the Congress comes to power? I am a loyal Congressman having put in 40 years of service. I have been elected as a legislator since 1972 without a break. Whatever the responsibility the party has bestowed upon me, I have discharged it with utmost loyalty, honesty, and determination. As the president of the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee, it is my bounden duty to see that the party emerges victorious in a majority of the places and is able to form a government on its own. I am a firm believer of Bhagvan Buddha, who said: "Do good and leave the rest to God." Even Basavanna said, "Work is worship." I am happy and convinced that I am doing my duty. The rest I will leave it to the wishes of my party high command and the people of Karnataka. What will the Congress focus on if it comes to power? Improving basic infrastructure will be the major thrust of the Congress party. Besides this the Congress also aims at enhancing irrigation facilities and bring about a revolutionary change in the lives of the poor people by mitigating their penury and poverty. Development will be the criteria and people below the poverty line shall be given attention by providing them with shelter, food, and employment. Our manifesto has thecomplete details of our ambitions for the people of Karnataka. What steps will the Congress take to resolve regional imbalance, if voted to power? The Congress is trying very hard to see to it that the problem of regional imbalance is sorted out at any cost. Disparities between regions, cities to village, should be removed. It was the Congress government that constituted the Nanjundappa Committee to go into the assessment of regional imbalance. We are committed to implement the recommendations in totality. Also it was the Congress party which tried to bring about an amendment to Article 371 of the Constitution to provide reservation in jobs and the education sector to the people living in the backward region. What steps will the Congress take to solve the Belgaum border problem? The border issue is dead. There is no need to whip up this issue again. The Mahajan Commission report is binding on all states concerned. Has the Congress intentionally fielded a weak candidate against BJP's chief ministerial candidate B S Yeddyurappa? We have no personal enmity with Yeddyurappa. But the Congress is determined to ensure that the communal forces shall not gain ground in Karnataka and hence the Congress party has decided to support S Bangarappa's (Samajwadi Party) candidature. Hence we have asked our candidate to withdraw his nomination from the Shikaripura constituency. What do you have to say about the Jaffer Sharrief episode? Is that problem completely solved? It is now a closed chapter. Sharrief has met party chief Sonia Gandhi [Images] and sorted out theissue. I don't think any problem exists at all. What difference has S M Krishna's return made to the Congress? With the return of Krishna, the Congress party in the state has consolidated its position. His return has invigorated the enthusiasm in party even at the grass root level. As the chairman of the KPCC election management committee, he is doing a remarkable job by bringing more and more people into the fold of the Congress party. 2b1af7f3a8